<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" href="/feed/bypass/styles/feed.css" media="screen"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="/feed/bypass/styles/feed.xsl"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/">

	<channel>
	  <!-- main channel info -->
        <title>vanishing stability</title>
        <link>http://catalina42discussionforum.yuku.com/topic/1252/t/vanishing-stability.html</link>
        <description>
        <![CDATA[ Fellow sailors,
            
            Wondering if there is a formal word on the Stability number of the MK1. I know these things are variable based on weight, rig, sail plan etc...But wondering if there is a sense, formal or otherwise, of the original factory designed/delivered boat.  
            
            I recently purchased hull 125 that was well upgraded by the previous owners for a Los Angeles to Annapolis cruise.  I plan to do some blue water as well and in my preparations and... ]]>
        </description>

		<!-- optional elements -->
		<language>en-us</language>
		<copyright>Copyright 2006, Yuku</copyright>
		<managingEditor>feeds@yuku.com (FeedMaster)</managingEditor>
		<webMaster>webmaster@yuku.com (WebMaster)</webMaster>
		<!-- note: dates need to be RFC 822 formated "Sat, 07 Sep 2002 00:00:01 GMT" -->
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2006 21:15:22 GMT</pubDate>
		<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 Mar 2006 12:53:29 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>Yuku Feeds 1.0</generator>
		<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
		<!-- <cloud domain="rpc.yuku.com" port="80" path="/RPC2" registerProcedure="pingMe" protocol="soap"/>-->
		<ttl>60</ttl>
		<!-- feed image -->
		
		<rating>
		{pics-1.1 &quot;http://www.icra.org/ratingsv02.html&quot; l gen true for &quot;http://yuku.com&quot; r (nz 1 vz 1 lz 1 oz 1 cz 1 ) &quot;http://www.rsac.org/ratingsv01.html&quot; l gen true for &quot;http://yuku.com&quot; r (n 0 s 0 v 0 l 0 ))
		</rating>
		<textInput>
			<title>Search</title>
			<description>Search Domain</description>
			<name>q</name>
			<link>http://yuku.com/search/direct/</link>
		</textInput>
		<!-- skip
		<skipHours>
			<hour>23</hour>
		</skipHours>
		<skipDays>
			<day>Monday</day>
			<day>Wednesday</day>
			<day>Friday</day>
		</skipDays>-->
		<!-- extensions -->


		<!-- channel items -->
		<!-- descriptions should be shorter than 500 char to be polite -->
		<!-- html shoud be stripped or escaped -->
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: vanishing stability ]]></title>
			<link>http://catalina42discussionforum.yuku.com/reply/3963/t/vanishing-stability.html#reply-3963</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ <!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>US SAILING</strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END--> has a calulator for many hull values - one of which is <!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>Angle of Vanishing Stability</strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END-->*:<br>
            <!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://www.sailingusa.info/cal__avs.htm">www.sailingusa.info/cal__avs.htm</a><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--><br>
            <br>
            I get an vanishing angle of 130.53 Deg using the following specs for a Catalina MK... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (ernieapril)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://catalina42discussionforum.yuku.com/sreply/3963</guid>
			<pubDate>Sun, 19 Mar 2006 12:53:29 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: vanishing stability ]]></title>
			<link>http://catalina42discussionforum.yuku.com/reply/3962/t/vanishing-stability.html#reply-3962</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ recently learned throguh US Sailing that Winddancer measured a stability of 126 as mesaured for it's ORR.  I am going through the ORR certification for the Bermuda Race and will know more, and share more when I have my own cert.  <br>
            <br>
            Jay  Encore 89-3 #125 ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (encore125)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://catalina42discussionforum.yuku.com/sreply/3962</guid>
			<pubDate>Sat, 18 Mar 2006 16:06:05 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: vanishing stability ]]></title>
			<link>http://catalina42discussionforum.yuku.com/reply/3961/t/vanishing-stability.html#reply-3961</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ If you go to <!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://www.transpacificyc.org/">www.transpacificyc.org/</a><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--> you will see the C42 that completed the Trans Pac last summer, Wind Dancer.<div class='signature'>Steve 642-2f TESA</div> ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (do335)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://catalina42discussionforum.yuku.com/sreply/3961</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2006 18:50:57 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: vanishing stability ]]></title>
			<link>http://catalina42discussionforum.yuku.com/reply/3960/t/vanishing-stability.html#reply-3960</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Norm, Mal and all,<br>
            <br>
            Thanks,  I hadn't visited the discussion in while or would have mailed earlier.  Thanks for your contribuitions.  114.3 from the factory.  This is a helpful reference.  Doesn't but quite measure up to the 115 minimum that some offshore races seem to have.  There was participation of a Catalina in the Transpac a few years back.  I might like to inquire as to whether that skipper had any issues here.  Any thoughts who/ how I might make... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (encore125)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://catalina42discussionforum.yuku.com/sreply/3960</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2006 18:09:49 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: vanishing stability ]]></title>
			<link>http://catalina42discussionforum.yuku.com/reply/3959/t/vanishing-stability.html#reply-3959</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ I just got a hold of a chart from Catalina Yachts &amp; put it on our web site,<br>
            <br>
            <!--EZCODE LINK START--><a href="http://www.catalina42.org/techspec.htm#stability" target="top">www.catalina42.org/techspec.htm#stability</a><!--EZCODE LINK END--><div class='signature'>~~~~_/)~~~~<br>
            Norm Perron, Hull #600/2 cabin, Aphrodisiac, Marina del Rey, CA</div> ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (CaptNorm42)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://catalina42discussionforum.yuku.com/sreply/3959</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2006 21:10:02 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: vanishing stability ]]></title>
			<link>http://catalina42discussionforum.yuku.com/reply/3958/t/vanishing-stability.html#reply-3958</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Having spoken to windward Yachting (the UK Catalina distributor) they were most helpful in providing the correct figures for the Catalina 42. There is no doubt that the figures shown on the RYA site are incorrect and are a direct result of the incorrect publication in the Yachting monthly magazine.<br>
            <br>
            The correct figures are as follows: -<br>
            <br>
            AVS - 114.3<br>
            STIX - 39.86<br>
            Ballast Ratio (Lead) 40.5%<br>... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (madmal)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://catalina42discussionforum.yuku.com/sreply/3958</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2006 02:56:05 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: vanishing stability ]]></title>
			<link>http://catalina42discussionforum.yuku.com/reply/3957/t/vanishing-stability.html#reply-3957</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Yes,  upon David's initial response I did some digging with regard to the Yachting Monthly reports.  I picked up a long discussion thread that suggests that the initial AVS was calculated using a GZ ? curve from the &quot;manufacture&quot; I assume Catalina, and it was the wrong curve.  Upon presentation of the new one the AVS measured 114, better but still less than the 120.  The thread included it seems the actual writer/publisher of the initial report<br>
            <br>
            I... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (encore125)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://catalina42discussionforum.yuku.com/sreply/3957</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2006 21:10:58 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: vanishing stability ]]></title>
			<link>http://catalina42discussionforum.yuku.com/reply/3956/t/vanishing-stability.html#reply-3956</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ If I recall, there was an error in the RYA's reporting on the stability numbers for the C-42 MkI and MkII.  There was a correction published in the Royal Yachting Monthly but the STIX data was never updated.  I am searching for the correction.  Perhaps Gerry Douglas might want to provide some input regarding what the AVS really is.  Maybe Garry Willis knows what the numbers are.<div class='signature'>Rodney Kidd,  C-42 #567 Sashay, 2 Cabin Fin, Marina Village, Alameda, CA</div> ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (sashay567)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://catalina42discussionforum.yuku.com/sreply/3956</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2006 10:32:52 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: vanishing stability ]]></title>
			<link>http://catalina42discussionforum.yuku.com/reply/3955/t/vanishing-stability.html#reply-3955</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Interesting that the RYA places it at 105.  US Sailing's cacluator estimates it at 132.7.<br>
            <br>
             US Sailing AVS calculator (<!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://www.sailingusa.info/cal__avs.htm)">www.sailingusa.info/cal__avs.htm)</a><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--> with a 13.83' beam, a 20,500# displacement, an 8,300# ballast weight and a 2.5' estimated canoe body draft (not including keel), I get an estimated AVS of 132.7 for a Catalina 42.  <br>
            <br>... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (melelana)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://catalina42discussionforum.yuku.com/sreply/3955</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2006 06:07:25 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: vanishing stability ]]></title>
			<link>http://catalina42discussionforum.yuku.com/reply/3954/t/vanishing-stability.html#reply-3954</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Dear Jay.<br>
            <br>
            Visit the RYA web-site at: - <!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://www.rya.org.uk/images/uploaded/f4493adb-617d-4185-8859-59d9c60b366a/Stability_Web_Page_10_11_05.pdf">www.rya.org.uk/images/upl..._11_05.pdf</a><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--><br>
            <br>
            Scroll down a few pages to the Catalina 42, you will see it has an AVS of 105 which is low. Any off shore boat should have a min of 120.<br>
            <br>... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (madmal)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://catalina42discussionforum.yuku.com/sreply/3954</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2006 04:13:10 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: vanishing stability ]]></title>
			<link>http://catalina42discussionforum.yuku.com/reply/3953/t/vanishing-stability.html#reply-3953</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ The Yachting Monthly magazine in the UK did a test on the Catalina 42 in March last year. They reported in detail on its stability. My recollection was that its angle of vanishing stability was 115 degrees which is low. However the boat fared better on the Stix test which is used more widely here in Europe. You can get a copy of the report for 5 dollars from yachtingmonthly.com ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (davidirvine)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://catalina42discussionforum.yuku.com/sreply/3953</guid>
			<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2006 12:14:58 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ vanishing stability ]]></title>
			<link>http://catalina42discussionforum.yuku.com/topic/1252/t/vanishing-stability.html</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Fellow sailors,<br>
            <br>
            Wondering if there is a formal word on the Stability number of the MK1. I know these things are variable based on weight, rig, sail plan etc...But wondering if there is a sense, formal or otherwise, of the original factory designed/delivered boat.  <br>
            <br>
            I recently purchased hull 125 that was well upgraded by the previous owners for a Los Angeles to Annapolis cruise.  I plan to do some blue water as well and in my... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (encore125)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://catalina42discussionforum.yuku.com/topic/1252</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2006 21:15:22 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
    <!-- end items -->

  </channel>
</rss>